Wednesday, 16 April 2025 »  Login
in
»
I am at

SC Stays Babri Masjid Verdict.

The Supreme Court on Monday morning stayed the verdict announced by the Allahabad High Court on the Ramjanmbhoomi - Babri Masjid case, describing it as 'strange'.
Hyderabad | 9th May 2011
The Supreme Court (SC) on Monday morning stayed the verdict announced by the Allahabad High Court (HC) in September 2010 on the Ramjanmbhoomi - Babri Masjid case, describing it as 'strange'.

Justices Aftab Alam and R M Lodha stayed the HC's verdict, and directed that status quo be maintaned at the site. They expressed surprise at the content of the verdict, which trisected the disputed landed among the Sunni Wakf Board, Akhil Bharat Hindu Mahasabha and the Nirmohi Akhara.

They explained that none of the complainants had sought partition, and that thus the verdict is 'strange' and that it shook a hornet's nest.

The SC admitted the appeals of all the litigating paties involved in the Ramjanmbhoomi - Babri Masjid case, and it has been reported that the court will regularly conduct hearings on the case henceforth.

For latecomers, the Babri Masjid case has been raging for more than 6 decades, and has been the cause of much communal violence.

The Hindus believe that the disputed site is in fact the birth-place of Lord Ram, one of the 10 avatars of the diety Vishnu, and demand that the region be handed over to the Hindu community.

The Muslims in India, on the other hand, fight for the masjid that was built during the time of Mughal Emperor Babur.

While some historians opine that an existing Ram temple was razed to the ground to make way for the mosque, other analysts say that the existing temple was extensively modified to resemble a mosque.

The controversial site was placed beyond the reach of Muslims by a government order in 1947, and a verdict passed by the Allahabad High Court in 1989 declared that the area belonged to the Hindus. However, when the Hindus sought to remodel the standing edifice, the Indian Muslims across the country vehemetly opposed this.

Another burst of communal riots over the issue in 1992 claimed 2,000 lives.

Religious issues have always been highly sensitive in India, especially if they involve both the Mulsim and the Hindu communities. All we can do is wait to see the end this particular issue will meet, if it ever does end, that is.
filed in:  Babri Masjid, Babri Masjid Title Suit, Babri Masjid Title Suit Verdict, Ramjanmbhoomi - Babri Masjid case, Allahabad High Court, Supreme Court
COMMENTS
Be the first to comment on SC Stays Babri Masjid Verdict.! Just use the simple form below.
LEAVE A COMMENT
fullhyd.com has 700,000+ monthly visits. Tell Hyderabad what you feel about SC Stays Babri Masjid Verdict.!
[no link to your name will appear, overriding global settings]
To preserve integrity, fullhyd.com allows ratings/comments only with a valid email. Your comments will be accepted once you give your email, and will be deleted if the email is not authenticated within 24 hours.
My name:

Dissatisfied with the results? Report a problem or error, or add a listing.
ADVERTISEMENT
SHOUTBOX!
{{todo.name}}
{{todo.date}}
[
]
{{ todo.summary }}... expand »
{{ todo.text }} « collapse
First  |  Prev  |   1   2  3  {{current_page-1}}  {{current_page}}  {{current_page+1}}  {{last_page-2}}  {{last_page-1}}  {{last_page}}   |  Next  |  Last
{{todos[0].name}}

{{todos[0].text}}

ADVERTISEMENT
This page was tagged for
10 may 2011 babri mazid result declear
parties included in babri masjid verdict
Present status of babri masjid in supreme court
babri masjid case number in allahabad high court
hyderabad May 2011 News
Follow fullhyd.com on
Copyright © 2023 LRR Technologies (Hyderabad) Pvt Ltd. All rights reserved. fullhyd and fullhyderabad are registered trademarks of LRR Technologies (Hyderabad) Pvt Ltd. The textual, graphic, audio and audiovisual material in this site is protected by copyright law. You may not copy, distribute or use this material except as necessary for your personal, non-commercial use. Any trademarks are the properties of their respective owners.