Jaszalcatraz wrote:The yahoo link that you gave has reviews by 15 critics and this one has reviews by 199 critics who write for Publications around the States.
Dear Jaszalcatraz:
You missed the point. We did not post the Yahoo! link to substantiate our position. It was just to show that there are always several opinions, and so usually many opinions contrary to a person's own.
Jaszalcatraz wrote:I'm not saying that DM should copy their example and post something that she does not believe in.
Instigatory - we do not respond to these

.
Jaszalcatraz wrote:I'm saying that she has extreemely bad taste and knowledge about movies.
Instigatory - we do not respond to these

.
Jaszalcatraz wrote:You mentioned that most people put on this list are here "for light-hearted" reasons.
We said "for light-hearted reasons that don't really hurt anybody". Your post did not at all appear like it was light-hearted - it was castigating, like this one is, too. Secondly, the person in question follows these forums, and is quite likely to be hurt at the tone of expression.
Jaszalcatraz wrote:As pertains your statement where you mentioned all disagreements about a review should take place on that page itself, I must bring to your notice a certain alter-ego of mine, juanrodrigo, who mentioned that the movies were bad. You deleted those too.
You know the language this alter-ego used. Something like "the reviewer must have been fantasizing about Brad Pitt bare-chested", and more such stuff. That was a strong personal attack.
Our reviews and profiles aren't sacrosanct, and visitors can say whatever they wish on the same page where people read our reviews, and can make their points emphatically. We just believe in opinions being objective, and not personal or vitriolic.
In the next version of fullhyd.com to be on in 2 months, we are making all editorial opinions secondary and user ratings primary, so as to further make fullhyd.com a reflection of the local opinion.
Regards,
fullhyd.com