hit list

by **akhilis2cool** » Fri Apr 16, 2004 3:24 pm

azazel wrote:cool
adding to hit-list , singers n music directors of Ekta Kapoor soaps..

i think the entire K series could be censored. what say director saaab?

by **akhilis2cool** » Fri Apr 16, 2004 3:25 pm

azazel wrote:cool
adding to hit-list , singers n music directors of Ekta Kapoor soaps..

i think the entire K series could be censored. what say director saaab?

by **johnny** » Fri Apr 16, 2004 3:53 pm

Please please please censor all the telugu soaps tooooo please... i hate em i dunno how ppl follow it n enjoy too.. yuckkkkkkkkkk

by **azazel** » Sat Apr 17, 2004 12:07 am

Yana Gupta's husband :evil:

+ to my list

by **CtrlAltDel** » Sat Apr 17, 2004 9:10 am

azazel wrote:Yana Gupta's husband + to my list

i second it...i dunno how dat nerdy photographer managed to net her!

musta done a real gr8 deed in his previous birth!

on this count add Michael Douglas too....

that senile idiot took away my Zeta

by **azazel** » Sat Apr 17, 2004 12:45 pm

saale Michael Douglas :evil:

y do ugly guys have the hot-chicks man??

Lenny Kravitz n Nicole 'drool' Kidman :shock:

makes me wanna puke :roll:

by **Johnny** » Sat Apr 17, 2004 1:15 pm

azazel wrote:saale Michael Douglas ki maa ki *****
y do ugly guys have the hot-chicks man??
Lenny Kravitz n Nicole 'drool' Kidman
makes me wanna puke

Dude... u cant generalise dat ugly guys get hot chicks... Well may be we can learn something frm it..wat really counts to make a hot chick fall for u isnt good looks... wat matters is the attitude, the sincereity, and most imp. the charm,,, who knows i have never seen lenny kravitz or interacted wid him might be he is charming and a real guy when with girl..

Similarly one can also say dat in general (not all

) pretty girls have bad taste :lol:

and 1 cent brains :twisted:

PEACE OUT

by **CtrlAltDel** » Sat Apr 17, 2004 2:36 pm

Johnny wrote:...wat really counts to make a hot chick fall for u isnt good looks... wat matters is the attitude, the sincereity, and most imp. the charm...

...and deep n full pockets... :twisted:

by **azazel** » Sat Apr 17, 2004 2:38 pm

i agree with all that man.. its just that the thought of Lenny with Nicole pisses me off :evil:

by **azazel** » Sat Apr 17, 2004 10:28 pm

i dunno how this stupid idiot could possibly have an absolutely hot chick like Anna K with him..

so, on popular demand.. Enrique Uglysias joins the hit-list :twisted:

by **CtrlAltDel** » Mon Apr 19, 2004 10:08 pm

azazel wrote:i dunno how this stupid idiot could possibly have an absolutely hot chick like Anna K with him..
so, on popular demand.. Enrique Uglysias joins the hit-list

does that mean he's NOT gay???

or just that he swings both ways??? :wink:

by **Johnny** » Mon Apr 19, 2004 10:33 pm

This reminds me of a signature of one of ma classmates,

I am not GAY, I am Bi

by **azazel** » Mon Apr 19, 2004 11:34 pm

CtrlAltDel wrote:does that mean he's NOT gay???
or just that he swings both ways???

come to think abt it, Anna *drool* is the perfect decoy for his gayness :!:

who cares what he does, he's ugly n on the List :twisted:

by **Nizam Pori** » Tue Apr 20, 2004 11:45 pm

Those pple who make me pay in a 1:10 proportion (when comapred to a Brit student) for my tution fees.

:evil:

Ekta Kapoor - For all her ****** up serials!

..........and.......

all the [/b] RASCISTS, FASCISTS, and SEXISTS on the face of this Earth.

by **azazel** » Wed Apr 21, 2004 12:21 pm

censors +to list

by ar » Sat May 08, 2004 1:41 pm

Damn govt vets..... die bastards die.... each and every stinkin one of ya..... gonna send maggots to feast on yer stinkin face.... wanna carve some names on yer dead carcass..... shitheads...... *stab* *stab* *stab* *stab*...... burn burn burn burn burn............

by **azazel** » Sat May 08, 2004 7:45 pm

what'd the vet do to deserve such treatment ??

by **CtrlAltDel** » Sun May 09, 2004 11:02 am

azazel wrote:what'd the vet do to deserve such treatment ??

the bastard musta been responsible 4 death of AR's pet....i know how it feels... :evil:

...

by **agonys_requiem** » Sun May 09, 2004 4:01 pm

CtrlAltDel wrote:
azazel wrote:what'd the vet do to deserve such treatment ??
the bastard musta been responsible 4 death of AR's pet....i know how it feels......

right on cad... dunno why they let them practice when they don't know the diff between their own arseh*les and faces.... it sucks man.....

by **fullhyd.com** » Mon May 10, 2004 6:43 pm

Jaszalcatraz wrote:SO what? If she bans me that makes this site a dictatorship doesnt it?
I remember the BIG MOD once saying that that this site was a truly democratic site, I wonder if he really meant that. Lets see. And btw just see the Kill Bill 1 review and the user comments there.....u'll get my point.

Dear Jaszalcatraz:

We did delete the posts, and that was because this thread is about people who you'd like to kill, and either because they are genuinely evil or because it's in fun, for light-hearted reasons that don't really hurt anybody.

This one falls into neither of the two categories. We're sure you agree that disagreeing with the review should be done either on the review page itself, or in a separate thread dedicated to it, not in a thread which is talking about persons who should be killed. And also that the disagreement should stick to the points made in the original review. You are, of course, perfectly justified in calling a review bad if you feel so. But as you'll appreciate, it's not done to get personal, and say that the person should be killed.

We believe nobody can write reviews that will always be agreed with by everyone who reads them. It was an opinion, and we publish the opinion since we are of the view that the person in question has sufficient knowledge, perspective and capability for judgment in the area.

You should check this link out:

http://movies.yahoo.com/shop?d=hv&cf=in ... 42&intl=us

The average rating by US critics of the movie in question was B (below A+, A, A- and B+). Obviously, we will not castigate all of them. And the movie was an average grosser - we will not shoot all the people who watched it and declared they didn't like it, thereby causing others to not watch it.

Certain people think certain things are good. Our usual policy is to take a call that will eventually be the view of a majority of the audiences (though we do make exceptions). We in general try to be accurate in telling a majority of our users, Hyderabad residents, whether they will like a film or not. And we have a good record at that - there is a very high correlation between the call we take on day 1 and the eventual box-office performance of a film.

And our being democratic is about as much of a choice as is obeying the laws of the land

.

Regards,

fullhyd.com

by **azazel** » Mon May 10, 2004 6:58 pm

see, i told ya Jaszzy.. but

fullhyd.com wrote: Dear Jaszalcatraz:
We did delete the posts, and that was because this thread is about people who you'd like to kill, and either because they are genuinely evil or because it's in fun, for light-hearted reasons that don't really hurt anybody.This one falls into neither of the two categories

huh??

u just gave the exact reasons y Jasz made that post.. according to Jasz, those were the reasons for her being on his hit-list!

not like he's really goin after her :roll:

if those were not the reasons for not puttin someone on our lists, nobody would qualify :wink:

p.s:i dun have nethn against DP, just dun agree with her views..thats all

by **Jaszalcatraz** » Mon May 10, 2004 7:19 pm

**in the best Cartman voice he can do**

Screw you guys, I'm going home

by **azazel** » Mon May 10, 2004 7:21 pm

Jaszalcatraz wrote:Screw you guys, I'm going home

stop doin that, ruining the impact .. :wink:

by **Jaszalcatraz** » Mon May 10, 2004 7:36 pm

Dear Mr. Mod,

In response to the link that you wanted me to see, here's a link that I want you to see.

http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/KillBillVol1-1126182/

The yahoo link that you gave has reviews by 15 critics and this one has reviews by 199 critics who write for Publications around the States.

I'm not saying that DM should copy their example and post something that she does not believe in. I'm saying that she has extreemely bad taste and knowledge about movies.

Then again, to each his own, so she can say whatever she wants about the movie. If she has that liberty then I guess I can say whatever I want about HER.

You mentioned that most people put on this list are here "for light-hearted" reasons. I wonder what I said in that post that makes you think that I seriously wanted to kill her. I put her here because I do not like the sway she has over Hyderabadi film-goers, just like people hate Ekta Kapoor for the sway she has over house-wives.

So according to your rules, no one should be on this list, the words "kill, maim, fracture" and all synonyms should not be mentioned.

As pertains your statement where you mentioned all disagreements about a review should take place on that page itself, I must bring to your notice a certain alter-ego of mine, juanrodrigo, who mentioned that the movies were bad. You deleted those too.

Since no argument of mine can bring back the delightful post of mine, lemme just say "This aint over yet".

by **Lucifer** » Mon May 10, 2004 7:48 pm

Nizam Pori wrote: all the [/b] RASCISTS, FASCISTS, and SEXISTS on the face of this Earth.

What is your bone with racists, facists, and sexists? I think they are some of the most honest people in the world - at least they admit openly to what they believe in, which is more than what can be said for closet gays.

hit list

Who is online